Number playing on earthquakes.

Advanced search

[Terms Of Conduct]

Terms Of Conduct

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[SteveC]

This revelation nonsense indicates that god does use earthquakes. I thought you said that god has nothing to do with earthquakes.

Once again, you (and Pat Robertson), are approaching the events described in Revelation, from the erroneous perspective that God will "cause" the irrevocable events described there. I contend that it is the nonsense of mankind, which will have caused the described events. Essentially, unsaved mankind will have become caught and devoured by his own destructive actions.

The guy behind the grassy knoll is to blame, right?

LOL, you have as much credibilty as Pat Robertson. One story is as wacky as the next.

It seems wacky unless you can think like China. China, and others, have been accusing the US of using their HAARP as a weapon of mass destruction. ELF leaves an unmistakable cloud "color spectrum" signature; which was caught on video, immediately prior to the 2008 Sichuan earthquake.

The earthquake caused over 85,000 deaths in China, and is today considered by China, to be an act of American warfare. If China was aware of ELF technology in 2008, then it's believable that they could have built a fully functional HAARP of their own, by 2011. Or worse, China has used their own HAARP on Sichuan, and is deliberately ginning-up anti-American sentiment with it's usage.....

Clouds over Sichuan 30 minutes before the earthquake....

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=KKMTSDzU1Z4

Clouds over Sichuan 10 minutes before the earthquake.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=hzVamNQzfYA

Such foolishness!!

HAARP explained:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAARP

[SteveC]

These are your questions:

Questions one would ask...

"Why are they playing with the numbers?"
"Why manipulate the 'news'?"
"What is the reason for the bias on this subject?"

Do you have any answers? It was my mistake thinking that scientists were involved.

So whoever "they" are. why are "they" doing it?

This post was really just a conversational piece.  I found it interesting that they would actually skew the information given.

Of course we will never know because only the author will know.

However, as a conversational piece, I think you had a point in the Godaphobia moment.  I read the article and saw that it did mention "the end of the world" in which one would naturally think that he was speaking about his view of "God" and what he thinks the end times would be in that context.

My only natural (and totally an opinion) view would be that he had something of a Godaphobia problem and didn't want anything to even remotely validate the Bible.

It is either that or perhaps he had nothing to do that day and was just fulfilling a requirement to fill space as per job requirement and didn't want to put any effort on actually crunching numbers because he wanted a coffee break or something.

Those are the only two I could come up with... I favor the first one though.

LOL,

So I have godaphobia for attributing disasters on god, and the author has godaphobia for trying not to attribute disasters on god.  

Welcome to the wacky world of fundamentalism!!! You guys have certainly entertained me the last few days.

[kwd111]

These are your questions:

Questions one would ask...

"Why are they playing with the numbers?"
"Why manipulate the 'news'?"
"What is the reason for the bias on this subject?"

Do you have any answers? It was my mistake thinking that scientists were involved.

So whoever "they" are. why are "they" doing it?

This post was really just a conversational piece.  I found it interesting that they would actually skew the information given.

Of course we will never know because only the author will know.

However, as a conversational piece, I think you had a point in the Godaphobia moment.  I read the article and saw that it did mention "the end of the world" in which one would naturally think that he was speaking about his view of "God" and what he thinks the end times would be in that context.

My only natural (and totally an opinion) view would be that he had something of a Godaphobia problem and didn't want anything to even remotely validate the Bible.

It is either that or perhaps he had nothing to do that day and was just fulfilling a requirement to fill space as per job requirement and didn't want to put any effort on actually crunching numbers because he wanted a coffee break or something.

Those are the only two I could come up with... I favor the first one though.

LOL,

So I have godaphobia for attributing disasters on god, and the author has godaphobia for trying not to attribute disasters on god.  

Boy,  you really do have a problem today Steve.

First you acted like I had said that God was doing it - which I didn't
Then you said that scientist had skewed the figures - which it didn't
And now you are saying that the author is "has Godaphobia for trying 'not to attribute the disasters on God' ".  Is there something going on in your life today?

Usually you don't do those things.

Welcome to the wacky world of fundamentalism!!! You guys have certainly entertained me the last few days.

And now you just went wacky.   

Go home, take two aspirins and text me in the morning.

[Palmtree]

Such foolishness!!

HAARP explained:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAARP

The wiki article provides some accurate information, however, it categorizes HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes under "conspiracy theories". Notice , there is no clear DENIAL of HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes. It is simply categorized under "conspiracy theory", without any further context. So if someone should mention the capability of HAARP as a weapon, he/she is pre-concluded as being on the "kook-fringe". IOW, it's a weapon of mass destruction, hiding in plain sight.

[SteveC]

These are your questions:

Questions one would ask...

"Why are they playing with the numbers?"
"Why manipulate the 'news'?"
"What is the reason for the bias on this subject?"

Do you have any answers? It was my mistake thinking that scientists were involved.

So whoever "they" are. why are "they" doing it?

This post was really just a conversational piece.  I found it interesting that they would actually skew the information given.

Of course we will never know because only the author will know.

However, as a conversational piece, I think you had a point in the Godaphobia moment.  I read the article and saw that it did mention "the end of the world" in which one would naturally think that he was speaking about his view of "God" and what he thinks the end times would be in that context.

My only natural (and totally an opinion) view would be that he had something of a Godaphobia problem and didn't want anything to even remotely validate the Bible.

It is either that or perhaps he had nothing to do that day and was just fulfilling a requirement to fill space as per job requirement and didn't want to put any effort on actually crunching numbers because he wanted a coffee break or something.

Those are the only two I could come up with... I favor the first one though.

LOL,

So I have godaphobia for attributing disasters on god, and the author has godaphobia for trying not to attribute disasters on god.  

Boy,  you really do have a problem today Steve.

First you acted like I had said that God was doing it - which I didn't
Then you said that scientist had skewed the figures - which it didn't
And now you are saying that the author is "has Godaphobia for trying 'not to attribute the disasters on God' ".  Is there something going on in your life today?

Usually you don't do those things.

Welcome to the wacky world of fundamentalism!!! You guys have certainly entertained me the last few days.

And now you just went wacky.   

Go home, take two aspirins and text me in the morning.

LOL, you win the earthquake debate. I was outsmarted at every turn and my biases were clearly revealed, I thought I'd skip all the pleasantries and get to the inevitable biblical connection to earthquakes. Who knew that you really only wanted to talk about earthquakes.

[kwd111]

These are your questions:

Questions one would ask...

"Why are they playing with the numbers?"
"Why manipulate the 'news'?"
"What is the reason for the bias on this subject?"

Do you have any answers? It was my mistake thinking that scientists were involved.

So whoever "they" are. why are "they" doing it?

This post was really just a conversational piece.  I found it interesting that they would actually skew the information given.

Of course we will never know because only the author will know.

However, as a conversational piece, I think you had a point in the Godaphobia moment.  I read the article and saw that it did mention "the end of the world" in which one would naturally think that he was speaking about his view of "God" and what he thinks the end times would be in that context.

My only natural (and totally an opinion) view would be that he had something of a Godaphobia problem and didn't want anything to even remotely validate the Bible.

It is either that or perhaps he had nothing to do that day and was just fulfilling a requirement to fill space as per job requirement and didn't want to put any effort on actually crunching numbers because he wanted a coffee break or something.

Those are the only two I could come up with... I favor the first one though.

LOL,

So I have godaphobia for attributing disasters on god, and the author has godaphobia for trying not to attribute disasters on god.  

Boy,  you really do have a problem today Steve.

First you acted like I had said that God was doing it - which I didn't
Then you said that scientist had skewed the figures - which it didn't
And now you are saying that the author is "has Godaphobia for trying 'not to attribute the disasters on God' ".  Is there something going on in your life today?

Usually you don't do those things.

Welcome to the wacky world of fundamentalism!!! You guys have certainly entertained me the last few days.

And now you just went wacky.  

Go home, take two aspirins and text me in the morning.

LOL, you win the earthquake debate. I was outsmarted at every turn and my biases were clearly revealed, I thought I'd skip all the pleasantries and get to the inevitable biblical connection to earthquakes. Who knew that you really only wanted to talk about earthquakes.

LOL

 

Yes, Steve, I do talk about other things.

PS...

Then again, I can understand how with our limited scope of interaction you could have come to that conclusion.

Blessings to you and your fam.

Ken

[SteveC]

Such foolishness!!

HAARP explained:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAARP

The wiki article provides some accurate information, however, it categorizes HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes under "conspiracy theories". Notice , there is no clear DENIAL of HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes. It is simply categorized under "conspiracy theory", without any further context. So if someone should mention the capability of HAARP as a weapon, he/she is pre-concluded as being on the "kook-fringe". IOW, it's a weapon of mass destruction, hiding in plain sight.

No Palm, you're not on the "kook fringe". After all,clouds over a disaster area always indicate WMDs. It's very strange when clouds, which are collections of moisture in the air, refract sunlight similar to how sunlight is refracted by the moisture in the air in the form of rainbows after rainstorms. The former always indicates human evil & WMDS, that latter always indicates pretty things like god and love.

And scientists refusing to acknowledge stupid conspiracy theories always indicates that the conspiracy theories are true.

And never mind the fact that you are in need of a man made disaster to get your god off the hook for a dispicable act, as described in the Bible, against mankind.

You are the kook fringe.

[Palmtree]

Such foolishness!!

HAARP explained:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAARP

The wiki article provides some accurate information, however, it categorizes HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes under "conspiracy theories". Notice , there is no clear DENIAL of HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes. It is simply categorized under "conspiracy theory", without any further context. So if someone should mention the capability of HAARP as a weapon, he/she is pre-concluded as being on the "kook-fringe". IOW, it's a weapon of mass destruction, hiding in plain sight.

No Palm, you're not on the "kook fringe". After all,clouds over a disaster area always indicate WMDs. It's very strange when clouds, which are collections of moisture in the air, refract sunlight similar to how sunlight is refracted by the moisture in the air in the form of rainbows after rainstorms. The former always indicates human evil & WMDS, that latter always indicates pretty things like god and love.

And scientists refusing to acknowledge stupid conspiracy theories always indicates that the conspiracy theories are true.

And never mind the fact that you are in need of a man made disaster to get your god off the hook for a dispicable act, as described in the Bible, against mankind.

You are the kook fringe.

If it's easier for you to explain away the truth, and label me as a kook, so your peaceful slumber is not disturbed; then feel free to lull yourself back to sleep, with happy thoughts of lovely rainbow clouds. If you never wake again, then you won't know the difference anyway. Sweet dreams Steve! 

[SteveC]

Such foolishness!!

HAARP explained:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAARP

The wiki article provides some accurate information, however, it categorizes HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes under "conspiracy theories". Notice , there is no clear DENIAL of HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes. It is simply categorized under "conspiracy theory", without any further context. So if someone should mention the capability of HAARP as a weapon, he/she is pre-concluded as being on the "kook-fringe". IOW, it's a weapon of mass destruction, hiding in plain sight.

No Palm, you're not on the "kook fringe". After all,clouds over a disaster area always indicate WMDs. It's very strange when clouds, which are collections of moisture in the air, refract sunlight similar to how sunlight is refracted by the moisture in the air in the form of rainbows after rainstorms. The former always indicates human evil & WMDS, that latter always indicates pretty things like god and love.

And scientists refusing to acknowledge stupid conspiracy theories always indicates that the conspiracy theories are true.

And never mind the fact that you are in need of a man made disaster to get your god off the hook for a dispicable act, as described in the Bible, against mankind.

You are the kook fringe.

If it's easier for you to explain away the truth, and label me as a kook, so your peaceful slumber is not disturbed; then feel free to lull yourself back to sleep, with happy thoughts of lovely rainbow clouds. If you never wake again, then you won't know the difference anyway. Sweet dreams Steve! 

I sleep well knowing that, if there is a god, he's not the soap opera buffoon you make him out to be.

Fundy boys, fundy boys
Whatcha gonna do, Whatcha gonna do
When god doesn't come for you
Fundy boys, fundy boys

[SteveC]

Hi Palm,

Another earthquake in China:
http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20100414/AS.China.Earthquake/

What's the score now:

US - 3
China - 0

China better hurry up and build there own top secret HAARM earthquake machine, if we're going to make that May 21, 2011 deadline.

[kwd111]

Such foolishness!!

HAARP explained:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAARP

The wiki article provides some accurate information, however, it categorizes HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes under "conspiracy theories". Notice , there is no clear DENIAL of HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes. It is simply categorized under "conspiracy theory", without any further context. So if someone should mention the capability of HAARP as a weapon, he/she is pre-concluded as being on the "kook-fringe". IOW, it's a weapon of mass destruction, hiding in plain sight.

No Palm, you're not on the "kook fringe". After all,clouds over a disaster area always indicate WMDs. It's very strange when clouds, which are collections of moisture in the air, refract sunlight similar to how sunlight is refracted by the moisture in the air in the form of rainbows after rainstorms. The former always indicates human evil & WMDS, that latter always indicates pretty things like god and love.

And scientists refusing to acknowledge stupid conspiracy theories always indicates that the conspiracy theories are true.

And never mind the fact that you are in need of a man made disaster to get your god off the hook for a dispicable act, as described in the Bible, against mankind.

You are the kook fringe.

If it's easier for you to explain away the truth, and label me as a kook, so your peaceful slumber is not disturbed; then feel free to lull yourself back to sleep, with happy thoughts of lovely rainbow clouds. If you never wake again, then you won't know the difference anyway. Sweet dreams Steve! 

Fundy boys, fundy boys
Whatcha gonna do, Whatcha gonna do
When God doesn't come for you
Fundy boys, fundy boys

 

Continue sharing the Gospel.... make a difference in people lives.

And then go to HIM if He doesn't come for me in my lifetime

[SteveC]

Such foolishness!!

HAARP explained:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAARP

The wiki article provides some accurate information, however, it categorizes HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes under "conspiracy theories". Notice , there is no clear DENIAL of HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes. It is simply categorized under "conspiracy theory", without any further context. So if someone should mention the capability of HAARP as a weapon, he/she is pre-concluded as being on the "kook-fringe". IOW, it's a weapon of mass destruction, hiding in plain sight.

No Palm, you're not on the "kook fringe". After all,clouds over a disaster area always indicate WMDs. It's very strange when clouds, which are collections of moisture in the air, refract sunlight similar to how sunlight is refracted by the moisture in the air in the form of rainbows after rainstorms. The former always indicates human evil & WMDS, that latter always indicates pretty things like god and love.

And scientists refusing to acknowledge stupid conspiracy theories always indicates that the conspiracy theories are true.

And never mind the fact that you are in need of a man made disaster to get your god off the hook for a dispicable act, as described in the Bible, against mankind.

You are the kook fringe.

If it's easier for you to explain away the truth, and label me as a kook, so your peaceful slumber is not disturbed; then feel free to lull yourself back to sleep, with happy thoughts of lovely rainbow clouds. If you never wake again, then you won't know the difference anyway. Sweet dreams Steve! 

Fundy boys, fundy boys
Whatcha gonna do, Whatcha gonna do
When God doesn't come for you
Fundy boys, fundy boys

 

Continue sharing the Gospel.... make a difference in people lives.

And then go to HIM if He doesn't come for me in my lifetime

My only disappointment with both of us ending up oblivious in death, is that we will never know who won all these debates. I know I'm right, but I want you to know it to!

[kwd111]

Such foolishness!!

HAARP explained:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAARP

The wiki article provides some accurate information, however, it categorizes HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes under "conspiracy theories". Notice , there is no clear DENIAL of HAARP's ability to trigger earthquakes. It is simply categorized under "conspiracy theory", without any further context. So if someone should mention the capability of HAARP as a weapon, he/she is pre-concluded as being on the "kook-fringe". IOW, it's a weapon of mass destruction, hiding in plain sight.

No Palm, you're not on the "kook fringe". After all,clouds over a disaster area always indicate WMDs. It's very strange when clouds, which are collections of moisture in the air, refract sunlight similar to how sunlight is refracted by the moisture in the air in the form of rainbows after rainstorms. The former always indicates human evil & WMDS, that latter always indicates pretty things like god and love.

And scientists refusing to acknowledge stupid conspiracy theories always indicates that the conspiracy theories are true.

And never mind the fact that you are in need of a man made disaster to get your god off the hook for a dispicable act, as described in the Bible, against mankind.

You are the kook fringe.

If it's easier for you to explain away the truth, and label me as a kook, so your peaceful slumber is not disturbed; then feel free to lull yourself back to sleep, with happy thoughts of lovely rainbow clouds. If you never wake again, then you won't know the difference anyway. Sweet dreams Steve!  

Fundy boys, fundy boys
Whatcha gonna do, Whatcha gonna do
When God doesn't come for you
Fundy boys, fundy boys

 

Continue sharing the Gospel.... make a difference in people lives.

And then go to HIM if He doesn't come for me in my lifetime

My only disappointment with both of us ending up oblivious in death, is that we will never know who won all these debates. I know I'm right, but I want you to know it to!

Not really Steve.

If you are right... no disappointments because no one will have any electrons running through the brain to be disappointed.

If I am right... then we will know who was right.

[SteveC]

Not really Steve.

If you are right... no disappointments because no one will have any electrons running through the brain to be disappointed.

If I am right... then we will know who was right.

There's the rub, you could be somewhat right, and very very wrong. I could claim victory in that!

[kwd111]

Not really Steve.

If you are right... no disappointments because no one will have any electrons running through the brain to be disappointed.

If I am right... then we will know who was right.

There's the rub, you could be somewhat right, and very very wrong. I could claim victory in that!

I am happy with somewhat right...  "somewhat right" - has a very big potential of making your very very wrong.   

If I am very very wrong... I will never know it!   

• Children's Prayer.... unc... by SteveC [July 30, 2010, 11:08:14 PM]
• Riot against Messianic Je... by SteveC [July 30, 2010, 09:43:30 PM]
• Court Upholds Expulsion o... by SteveC [July 30, 2010, 09:25:51 PM]
• The Kids Are All Right. by SteveC [July 30, 2010, 09:08:19 PM]
• Honduras... here we come!... by SquirleyWurley [July 30, 2010, 06:23:50 PM]
• A thought by Betsy by kwd111 [July 29, 2010, 03:56:49 PM]
• 77'7" Kerrville Cross Rai... by SteveC [July 28, 2010, 01:54:13 PM]
• That Darling of Creationi... by SteveC [July 27, 2010, 05:51:56 PM]
• Segmentation & Evolution by SteveC [July 27, 2010, 10:56:42 AM]
• I must have overslept on ... by SteveC [July 26, 2010, 11:12:09 PM]
• 'Little Brown Balls' Tie ... by charliejohn [July 25, 2010, 07:34:39 PM]
• Whales Descended From Tin... by SteveC [July 25, 2010, 07:23:50 PM]
• South Pacific Plant May B... by SteveC [July 25, 2010, 07:05:31 PM]
• Transitional Species Exis... by SteveC [July 25, 2010, 05:09:41 PM]
• Fundamentalist's Peppered... by SteveC [July 25, 2010, 02:32:03 PM]
• Haeckel and his Embryos by SteveC [July 25, 2010, 10:36:39 AM]
• Flagellum,"poster child" ... by SteveC [July 24, 2010, 11:10:12 PM]
• Evo's Fundamentalist Posi... by Ed.W [July 22, 2010, 10:44:19 AM]

Members

• Total Members: 558
• Latest: Messedumbessy

Stats

• Total Posts: 86510
• Total Topics: 2615
• Online Today: 19
• Online Ever: 135
• (July 09, 2010, 02:08:16 PM)

Users Online

Users: 1
Guests: 21
Total: 22

SteveC