BeliefCorner
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. March 10, 2010, 12:58:40 AM


Login with username, password and session length


User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 10, 2010, 12:58:40 AM

Login with username, password and session length
    Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down
      Print  
    Author Topic: Do SDA's consider themselves Christian?  (Read 2930 times)
    VG59
    Guest
    « Reply #45 on: April 23, 2009, 11:25:20 AM »

    My friend,  If your church does not have food police why would they have a problem with brining a chicken casserole which is in keeping with the Biblical laws?

    Food police? What's your problem with Adventism and vegetarianism? I mean seriously, you almost sound hostel to it. I wish I would have grown up that way quite frankly. I think it's a given when you walk into any Adventist pot luck around the world it's going to be vegetarian. It's a given. My pastor announces to everyone who wants to come, guests and members alike that the pot luck is vegetarian.

    Quote
    And for that matter why is it a test of faith to abstain from the most Biblical drink:  wine?

    Alcoholic wine right. You know as well as I do that not all "wine" in the Bible was alcoholic. But why ask? You know as well as I do that an alcohol free life is much healthier than a life that evolves around alcohol.

    Quote
    I am not paranoid.  I kindly ask you to refrain from saying such.  It isn't nice to call people paranoid.   I will try not to use such terms about your personal emotions or motivations also.


    Used regarding the subject in general terms, not insinuating you yourself are "paranoid."

    Quote
    Such as?  I told you such as in the next sentences.  I don't think dairy free is good universally.  Nor do I think a complete vegetarian diet is good. Nor do I think the two meal a day or the raw food concepts are in the best interest.

    That's your opinion. Don't let the fact that most every study ever done disagrees with your opinion sway you.

    Quote
    As far as gluten, I am not sure of the relevance given that a good bulk of the Adventist diet and the meat analogs are GLUTEN.  I know many Adventist families that make home made gluten.  I have made it with my Mother.

    And? Certain folks are allergic to gluten and gluten products.

    Quote
    As far as dairy, yes there are plenty of people that do not agree with dairy.  They haven't read EGW.  That doesn't mean they render validity to her writings.

    Not at all. But it's interesting to me that a number of "sectarian" diet and health resources and web sites even quote EGW.

    My friend I have no problem with vegetarianism.  You were the one who brought the term food police into it.  My issue is when a church attaches what one eats to their state of righteousness.  It was Jesus who said it is not what goes into the body that makes a person unclean.

    I was merely making the point that if there were no food police in your denomination a chicken casserole would be welcome in your church. 

    Adventist people continually say that there is no problem with Adventists eating meat.  Well then if that is true, there would be no problem with a person eating a chicken casserole at an Adventist pot luck. 

    I have been an Adventist.  It isn't cool to eat meat in front of other Adventists.  There is a reason for that. 

    I actually would prefer a vegetarian diet if my household would stand for it! This conversation is not about my opinion on vegetarianism on the whole, it is about my opinion on diet being attached to one's state or risk of salvation as well as my opinion on people loosing balance with their diet on the road to salvation.  And I have seen this by far to frequent in the SDA population. 

    Let me tell you something. And before the usual response of saying, "Your family does not eat properly and does not know how to eat a proper vegetarian diet" I will tell you about my family.  My Dad is an RN with his certification as an anesthetist as well as a ND certificate.  My Mom is an LPN and my one all of my brothers are either nurses or massage practitioners.  They eat a whole grain, mostly raw vegetarian diet with what is considered adequate plant proteins on the two meal a day program your prophetess perscribes.  It is considered sound even by the secular vegan.  That being said, when my father had his massive heart attack and a quadruple bypass his albumin levels were so critically low the cardiologist threw a fit over their diet.  Albumin level is a marker of adequate nutrition and a predictor of healing of surgical wounds.  He wasn't happy.  Despite this excessive diet my dads lipid profile was a disaster. 

    I have nephews and nieces that growth percentiles are at the failure to thrive level, their hgb/hct levels low and the best the family can offer is that they are being measured by the standards of meat eaters and they are "normal" for vegans.  Yet there is no established data but it is clear that vegan children are not meeting the acceptable norms in terms of adequate nutrition and growth that the rest of children have.  They are held to the advice of your prophetess to not allow kids to eat between meals while all the contemporary nutritional knowledge say that healthy snacks are a part of a healthy diet and essential to the growing child. 

    I have grave concerns for people that are put on the "progressive change" tract of the SDA church.  It is my opinion that they become addicted to the next step on the road to dietary salvation.  I always wonder on my next visit to my family, "what is the next thing they are going to give up or add to their diet to make them better fit for eternal life?"  And there is always something whether it be giving up or adding to.  The nutritional supplements, now that is worthy of a thread it inself the question being:  "how much money and how many Adventists are taking nutritional supplements that are not back by research"?  But I will tell you that these supplements all have some things in common:  A distrust and disparaging attitude to mainstream thinking, a claim of how dangerous and unhealthy our food has become, and a promise that their product will compensate for the toxins and nutritional defficiencies found in today's food.  Adventist feed on this sort of advertisment because it supports their world view that everything is getting progresssively worse in this world as a sign of the end times. 

    So the bottom line is I AM NOT hostile to vegetarianism.  But I would say that yes I am HOSTILE towards the excessive thinking that brings people to make such extreme changes in their diets that they are nutritionally defficient and they can not eat with the rest of the world.

    Oh that is another element of this excessive diet.  It SEPERATES the HOLY from the un holy.  The excessive vegan also feeds on their righteousness when they go into a restaurant and can not find anything to eat.  To watch them carry on could be funny if they were not people you love. If I had a dime for everytime they say, "Why do they go and ruin it by adding such and such to it, I CAN'T EAT THAT!"  And try to even make a basic vegetarian meal for them in your own home.  Forget about it, there will be something not quite right about it unless you just get the raw vegetables out of the fridge and say, "here fix them any way you like" and be done with it.  Oh I could go on........

    And this is not just my family.  It is MANY ADVENTIST families roped into believing they need to make continual improovements in their diet as part of their development of characters to "get ready for Jesus to come". 

    So if you choose to attach the word hostile to my thoughts, get my thoughts straight dude.  I think vegetarianism is OK.  I don't think the excess I see in the dietary instructions of your prophetess OK.

    Please do not say that I know as well as you do anything. That smacks of the implications that I am not being authentic in what I am voicing.  And nothing could be further from the truth.

    I believe it was real alcoholic wine for a variety of reasons that are pointless to go over with an Adventist.  I know your point of view.  I would hope you would respectfully see that we have different points of view rather than throwing the accusation that I am saying something that I know not to be true.

    Furthermore I believe a glass of wine with a meal is and has been substantiated by science to be a part of a healthy diet for adults. There is no point in having this conversation further.  I have had this conversation many times with Adventists.  To agree to disagree is the best either of us could hope for.

    Even to say that you think I am being paranoid on a given subject is a description of my character and motives and I don't appreciate it.  Stick to the subject material and not me.

    Merely saying that most every study would disagree with me is not bringing forward the proof and the studies of both sides.  But again it is no point in having that conversation either.

    You were the one brining up gluten, not me.  I don't get it twice you bring something up and then whent a counter point is brought up you question the relevance.  The relevance comes from my response to your statement connecting what another Christian dietician said about gluten to the writings of EGW.  And EGW did not oppose gluten and probably promoted it. Here is your statement:
    I was listening to a "non-Adventist" radio station just yesterday that interviewed a Christian dietitian that recommended freeing the diet of dairy and gluten. I wonder if she was "brainwashed" by the Adventists and EGW.

    As far as sectarian websites quoting EGW, there is a lot of junk out there on the www so the mere quoting of EGW by other sources doesn't impress me. 
    Logged
    RND
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Posts: 234



    « Reply #46 on: April 23, 2009, 11:52:24 AM »

    Regarding points in your last post:

    DUDE!!! Minor errors?  No I don't think so. 

    Yeah, the Gospels have "small minor errors" in them.

    Quote
    I could list on and on.  Amalgamation of man and beast (yes I know the apologetics the SDAs make for these comments)  The wearing of corsets causes pulmonary lung defects in the babies the women carry (impossible).  The wearing of wigs creates a feverish and toxic brain and brain damage.  The solitary sin  Grin causing neurological disease in people. The prophecy of Jesus coming before her death, before the death of many of the early ban of Adventists, didn't happen.   These are few right off the top of my head.  EGW said some bizarre things that have been well proven by science and tincture of time not to be true.

    Different times. Wearing corsets wasn't healthy which is why they are worn now-a-days. What were the wigs made of in EGW day? Masturbation can lead to "mental" issues.

    Quote
    As far as your personal acceptance of EGW, perhaps you did not accept her as a prophet when they baptized you or accepted you into the church.  However, read the fundamentals of your religion and you usually recite those at the baptism as a profession of faith and her gift of prophecy is one of them

    Not at all! My profession of faith required no such "confession."

    Quote
    Who paid for my education?  BEOG and student loans and a little help from my parents.  Most of it on loan and BEOG though.

    Great!

    Quote
    LOL if the meek inherit the earth, it will be on my death bed.  I am rich in love and good memories.


    Tooting your own horn or are you trying to convince me of something?

    Quote
    I am certain people from other denominations have/had anxiety over damnation.  I think that some denominations do it better than others, SDA's amongst the better ones at instilling the fear into people. 

    Really? Perfect love casts out all fear. I have learned more in 3 years of Adventism about the depth of Christs undying love for mankind than any other denomination could hope to teach.

    Quote
    Hey I have not projected a darn thing on you, certainly not my bad experience.  You please go back and find one quote where I suggested you are having a bad experience with the SDAs or that you are suffering from anxiety or so forth.  It is apparent that you are happy as a well I'd say a spig in mud but the Adventists don't think much of pigs with your faith.  How about as happy as a Goldren Retriever with a tennis ball? 


    Your "generalizations" suggest a certain "it's either this way or that way" with Adventists which simply aren't true. We are all on our "own" walk.

    Quote
    Please RND, I am not liking your tone.  I am asking you again to refrain from commenting on me personally and my motives and sticking to the subject, the theology of the SDAs. 

    I will do my best to not make personal comments regarding you all the same.

    I think you are being "hyper-sensitive" regarding my comments frankly.
    Logged

    VG59
    Guest
    « Reply #47 on: April 23, 2009, 12:14:28 PM »

    Regarding points in your last post:

    DUDE!!! Minor errors?  No I don't think so. 

    Yeah, the Gospels have "small minor errors" in them.

    Quote
    I could list on and on.  Amalgamation of man and beast (yes I know the apologetics the SDAs make for these comments)  The wearing of corsets causes pulmonary lung defects in the babies the women carry (impossible).  The wearing of wigs creates a feverish and toxic brain and brain damage.  The solitary sin  Grin causing neurological disease in people. The prophecy of Jesus coming before her death, before the death of many of the early ban of Adventists, didn't happen.   These are few right off the top of my head.  EGW said some bizarre things that have been well proven by science and tincture of time not to be true.

    Different times. Wearing corsets wasn't healthy which is why they are worn now-a-days. What were the wigs made of in EGW day? Masturbation can lead to "mental" issues.

    Quote
    As far as your personal acceptance of EGW, perhaps you did not accept her as a prophet when they baptized you or accepted you into the church.  However, read the fundamentals of your religion and you usually recite those at the baptism as a profession of faith and her gift of prophecy is one of them

    Not at all! My profession of faith required no such "confession."

    Quote
    Who paid for my education?  BEOG and student loans and a little help from my parents.  Most of it on loan and BEOG though.

    Great!

    Quote
    LOL if the meek inherit the earth, it will be on my death bed.  I am rich in love and good memories.


    Tooting your own horn or are you trying to convince me of something?

    Quote
    I am certain people from other denominations have/had anxiety over damnation.  I think that some denominations do it better than others, SDA's amongst the better ones at instilling the fear into people. 

    Really? Perfect love casts out all fear. I have learned more in 3 years of Adventism about the depth of Christs undying love for mankind than any other denomination could hope to teach.

    Quote
    Hey I have not projected a darn thing on you, certainly not my bad experience.  You please go back and find one quote where I suggested you are having a bad experience with the SDAs or that you are suffering from anxiety or so forth.  It is apparent that you are happy as a well I'd say a spig in mud but the Adventists don't think much of pigs with your faith.  How about as happy as a Goldren Retriever with a tennis ball? 


    Your "generalizations" suggest a certain "it's either this way or that way" with Adventists which simply aren't true. We are all on our "own" walk.

    Quote
    Please RND, I am not liking your tone.  I am asking you again to refrain from commenting on me personally and my motives and sticking to the subject, the theology of the SDAs. 

    I will do my best to not make personal comments regarding you all the same.

    I think you are being "hyper-sensitive" regarding my comments frankly.

    The first comment you made was a classic example of taking something out of context.  Please let it be noted I was not whatsoever commenting on the minor errors of the Bible but your reference that EGW had minor errors in her writings.  She didn't. 

    The point on the corsets is that EGW thought, based on conteporary thought of her time is that merely wearing a corset and having it restrict the mother's lungs could be passed onto the child's lungs.  We know better now and we know that this is not true.  Yet her congregation believed this to be true.  You missed the point.

    And I am really somewhat taken aback that you believe that masturbation can cause mental problems.

    Have you read the fundamentals of your faith?  They used to be what was recited at baptism or acceptance into the SDA church.  If you did not recite these, either the church has changed or your church is not following protocol

    Tooting your own horn or are you trying to convince me of something?  If this is the sort of nasty comment I can expect from you in a conversation, I won't talk to you anymore.  This is not worth it.

    Seriously, talk to other people.  You are not being nice.
    Logged
    RND
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Posts: 234



    « Reply #48 on: April 23, 2009, 12:35:57 PM »

    My friend I have no problem with vegetarianism.  You were the one who brought the term food police into it.  My issue is when a church attaches what one eats to their state of righteousness.  It was Jesus who said it is not what goes into the body that makes a person unclean.

    I did bring up "food police" because you seemed to be saying that Adventist come to check out my pantry. Look, the fact that Adventist ask people to bring a vegetarian dish has everything to do with being sensitive to what other people desire, that's all.

    In no wise did Jesus say man could eat pigs or hamsters in Mark 7.

    Quote
    I was merely making the point that if there were no food police in your denomination a chicken casserole would be welcome in your church. 


    No, a chicken casserole wouldn't be welcomed in the same way as if I was throwing a party at my home and asked the guests to bring a veggie dish because most people attending would be veggies.

    It's regarding being sensitive to the needs of others.

    Quote
    Adventist people continually say that there is no problem with Adventists eating meat.  Well then if that is true, there would be no problem with a person eating a chicken casserole at an Adventist pot luck. 

    I have been an Adventist.  It isn't cool to eat meat in front of other Adventists.  There is a reason for that. 

    What? I've eaten meat in front of other "Adventists" on certain occasions....no one said a thing to me.

    Quote
    I actually would prefer a vegetarian diet if my household would stand for it! This conversation is not about my opinion on vegetarianism on the whole, it is about my opinion on diet being attached to one's state or risk of salvation as well as my opinion on people loosing balance with their diet on the road to salvation.  And I have seen this by far to frequent in the SDA population. 

    And yet it is obvious your "fears" are unfounded.

    Quote
    Let me tell you something. And before the usual response of saying, "Your family does not eat properly and does not know how to eat a proper vegetarian diet" I will tell you about my family.  My Dad is an RN with his certification as an anesthetist as well as a ND certificate.  My Mom is an LPN and my one all of my brothers are either nurses or massage practitioners.  They eat a whole grain, mostly raw vegetarian diet with what is considered adequate plant proteins on the two meal a day program your prophetess perscribes.  It is considered sound even by the secular vegan.  That being said, when my father had his massive heart attack and a quadruple bypass his albumin levels were so critically low the cardiologist threw a fit over their diet.  Albumin level is a marker of adequate nutrition and a predictor of healing of surgical wounds.  He wasn't happy.  Despite this excessive diet my dads lipid profile was a disaster. 

    I have nephews and nieces that growth percentiles are at the failure to thrive level, their hgb/hct levels low and the best the family can offer is that they are being measured by the standards of meat eaters and they are "normal" for vegans.  Yet there is no established data but it is clear that vegan children are not meeting the acceptable norms in terms of adequate nutrition and growth that the rest of children have.  They are held to the advice of your prophetess to not allow kids to eat between meals while all the contemporary nutritional knowledge say that healthy snacks are a part of a healthy diet and essential to the growing child. 

    Sorry to hear about you family but blaming you dad's heart attack on anything other than Satan himself is unwise in my opinion. You are naming the exception and not the rule. I attended four funerals last year and everyone was over 80 years old, with one guy living to 94. Statics consistently show that Adventist live longer on average than most....."on average."

    Quote
    I have grave concerns for people that are put on the "progressive change" tract of the SDA church.  It is my opinion that they become addicted to the next step on the road to dietary salvation.  I always wonder on my next visit to my family, "what is the next thing they are going to give up or add to their diet to make them better fit for eternal life?"  And there is always something whether it be giving up or adding to.  The nutritional supplements, now that is worthy of a thread it inself the question being:  "how much money and how many Adventists are taking nutritional supplements that are not back by research"?  But I will tell you that these supplements all have some things in common:  A distrust and disparaging attitude to mainstream thinking, a claim of how dangerous and unhealthy our food has become, and a promise that their product will compensate for the toxins and nutritional defficiencies found in today's food.  Adventist feed on this sort of advertisment because it supports their world view that everything is getting progresssively worse in this world as a sign of the end times. 

    You mean it isn't? Man, you sure do like to "project" alot. Your dad had a heart attack and a bypass and you bemoan him wanting him to live longer and better and more healthy?

    Quote
    So the bottom line is I AM NOT hostile to vegetarianism.  But I would say that yes I am HOSTILE towards the excessive thinking that brings people to make such extreme changes in their diets that they are nutritionally defficient and they can not eat with the rest of the world.

    And what is that to you? Seriously? How does what one person chooses to do with their diet effect you in one small way? It's "projection" and "presumption" in my mind.

    Quote
    Oh that is another element of this excessive diet.  It SEPERATES the HOLY from the un holy.  The excessive vegan also feeds on their righteousness when they go into a restaurant and can not find anything to eat.  To watch them carry on could be funny if they were not people you love. If I had a dime for everytime they say, "Why do they go and ruin it by adding such and such to it, I CAN'T EAT THAT!"  And try to even make a basic vegetarian meal for them in your own home.  Forget about it, there will be something not quite right about it unless you just get the raw vegetables out of the fridge and say, "here fix them any way you like" and be done with it.  Oh I could go on........

    I've never seen this myself. You seem to be taking your own individual situation and projecting them on others. When my daughter makes dinner she'll gladly tell me they made "pork and beans" in advance but you can have this as a replacement. Usually I'm good with the salad. When they order pepperoni pizza and antipasto salad they always order a cheese for me. It works out fine.

    Quote
    And this is not just my family.  It is MANY ADVENTIST families roped into believing they need to make continual improovements in their diet as part of their development of characters to "get ready for Jesus to come". 

    Generalization and projection.

    Quote
    So if you choose to attach the word hostile to my thoughts, get my thoughts straight dude.  I think vegetarianism is OK.  I don't think the excess I see in the dietary instructions of your prophetess OK.

    That's YOU! I know others that have welcomed EGW's insight.

    Quote
    Please do not say that I know as well as you do anything. That smacks of the implications that I am not being authentic in what I am voicing.  And nothing could be further from the truth.

    I just think you are being hyper-general frankly.

    Quote
    I believe it was real alcoholic wine for a variety of reasons that are pointless to go over with an Adventist.  I know your point of view.  I would hope you would respectfully see that we have different points of view rather than throwing the accusation that I am saying something that I know not to be true.


    So no one ever drank freshly squeezed grape juice in the Bible....not even once? It was all fermented? I find that highly unlikely frankly considering that it took at least 12 weeks for wine to ferment to the point where there was a substantial amount of alcohol to make the wine worthy of drink.

    Quote
    Furthermore I believe a glass of wine with a meal is and has been substantiated by science to be a part of a healthy diet for adults. There is no point in having this conversation further.  I have had this conversation many times with Adventists.  To agree to disagree is the best either of us could hope for.

    Hey great! Believe that all you want. There are more and more studies that show that even minimal amounts of alcohol can lead to cancer increased risks.

    Daily glass of wine may increase cancer risk

    Quote
    Even to say that you think I am being paranoid on a given subject is a description of my character and motives and I don't appreciate it.  Stick to the subject material and not me.

    You are overly sensitive frankly Val.

    Quote
    Merely saying that most every study would disagree with me is not bringing forward the proof and the studies of both sides.  But again it is no point in having that conversation either.

    If you can show me any study ever done that a high animal flesh intake diet is better that a balanced one or a vegetarian one I'd listen.

    But you would find one.

    Quote
    You were the one brining up gluten, not me.  I don't get it twice you bring something up and then whent a counter point is brought up you question the relevance.  The relevance comes from my response to your statement connecting what another Christian dietician said about gluten to the writings of EGW.  And EGW did not oppose gluten and probably promoted it. Here is your statement:
    I was listening to a "non-Adventist" radio station just yesterday that interviewed a Christian dietitian that recommended freeing the diet of dairy and gluten. I wonder if she was "brainwashed" by the Adventists and EGW.

    As far as sectarian websites quoting EGW, there is a lot of junk out there on the www so the mere quoting of EGW by other sources doesn't impress me. 

    Val, I'm not bringing things up to "counter" or question the relevance of any points you make, man oh man, re-read what I write. All I said was "Certain folks are allergic to gluten and gluten products." That's all. The comment you made doesn't change the fact that certain folks are allergic to gluten and gluten products.
    Logged

    VG59
    Guest
    « Reply #49 on: April 23, 2009, 12:45:53 PM »

    I won't respond to people that do not talk nice.
    Logged
    RND
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Posts: 234



    « Reply #50 on: April 23, 2009, 12:46:23 PM »

    The first comment you made was a classic example of taking something out of context.  Please let it be noted I was not whatsoever commenting on the minor errors of the Bible but your reference that EGW had minor errors in her writings.  She didn't.

    Val, pay attention will you. My comment about small minor errors was always about the Bible. I have never assumed EGW never made errors....it's obvious she did. Moshe made errors. Jeremiah made errors. Lot's of "prophets" have made errors.

    Quote
    The point on the corsets is that EGW thought, based on conteporary thought of her time is that merely wearing a corset and having it restrict the mother's lungs could be passed onto the child's lungs.  We know better now and we know that this is not true.  Yet her congregation believed this to be true.  You missed the point.

    Not at all, goes with the thought at one time that a woman could ride a horse or run a foot race without causing damage to herself. I find it interesting that women still ride horse and run races they just don't wear corsets anymore.

    Quote
    And I am really somewhat taken aback that you believe that masturbation can cause mental problems.

    In certain people? You bet it can. Men especially can be so engaged with themselves that they forgo intimacy with a woman. You kidding? Anything, and I mean anything can become addictive and detrimental.

    Quote
    Have you read the fundamentals of your faith?  They used to be what was recited at baptism or acceptance into the SDA church.  If you did not recite these, either the church has changed or your church is not following protocol

    Not only have I read them I posted them on this board. I was just not required to cited them "verbatim" to become an Adventists.

    Quote
    Tooting your own horn or are you trying to convince me of something?  If this is the sort of nasty comment I can expect from you in a conversation, I won't talk to you anymore.  This is not worth it.

    Seriously, talk to other people.  You are not being nice.

    Just asked a simple question. You seemed to be trying or needing to "justify" yourself to me. Look, I have no problem with you being an "ex-Adventist." That happens in all denominations all the time. But just limit your "projections" about Adventism to what you actually know instead of guessing.
    Logged

    RND
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Posts: 234



    « Reply #51 on: April 23, 2009, 12:48:11 PM »

    I won't respond to people that do not talk nice.

    You are "hyper-sensitive" in my book Val. You are certainly entitled to your opinion of Adventists and Adventism, but your projections are unwarranted and undesired.
    Logged

    Lilly
    Forum Moderator
    Hero Member
    ******
    Offline Offline

    Posts: 2179

    Religious affiliation: Christian


    « Reply #52 on: April 23, 2009, 02:49:00 PM »

    This has been a fascinating conversation from my view.  I think your perspectives are so far apart it would be difficult for you to see each others frame of reference.  But with that said, I would appreciate it if in your discussion you would refrain from making personal judgments about the other member in any way and stick to discussing the subject matter.

    Thanks,

    Lilly
    Logged
    Samuelbb7
    Jr. Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Posts: 83


    « Reply #53 on: April 25, 2009, 03:17:48 PM »


    How long have you been an Adventist?

    Over 30 years. I am a local Elder.

    Quote
    I'd suggest you to challenge your food police theory by bringing a chicken noodle casserole to the next pot luck and make sure you put a sign on it that this product contains real chicken and dairy. 

    Well we have put contains dairy a number of times with no problem. We did have one new member bring Fried Chicken which everyone ate.  But in general it is Vegetarian and not Vegan we serve. We have had members who do try to push a more vegan style. But they are a minority.

    Quote


    As far as my question on length of time as an Adventist. Read EGW more and you will see that she reccommends a progressive dietary change.  The culture goes easy on the newbies.  But as your time in the fold increases there will be subtle messages given to you that the general expectation is that progressively you will become vegetarian, give up refined foods, etc. 

    True. I have read the testimonies and a large number of her books. I have her books on CD also. I have also read Adventist's hot Potatoes about the misuse of some of here books.

    Quote
    I am not saying that some of the practices of SDA with regards to diet are not beneficial.  They are.  Some of them.  But as the diet progresses there are many things within the diet that are a concern.  Some of them are the elimination of dairy completely, the raw food movement within your church, the excessive amount of fiber in the raw food/vegan diet, and the "two meals a day" movement.

    Excessive Fiber? Most eat to little fiber.  Yes we have extremists in the SDA church. That does not invalidate the basic teaching or remove the Fact that SDA are on the list as some of the longest lived people group in the world.
    Logged
    Samuelbb7
    Jr. Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Posts: 83


    « Reply #54 on: April 25, 2009, 07:04:20 PM »

    Regarding points in your last post:

    DUDE!!! Minor errors?  No I don't think so.  I could list on and on.  Amalgamation of man and beast (yes I know the apologetics the SDAs make for these comments)  The wearing of corsets causes pulmonary lung defects in the babies the women carry (impossible).  The wearing of wigs creates a feverish and toxic brain and brain damage.  The solitary sin  Grin causing neurological disease in people. The prophecy of Jesus coming before her death, before the death of many of the early ban of Adventists, didn't happen.   These are few right off the top of my head.  EGW said some bizarre things that have been well proven by science and tincture of time not to be true.

    Wearing a corset that reduces a women's waist to 18" is not healthy.  I have never read that she wrote it caused lung disease in infants. But in women who could not breath it would seem like it.  Wigs were often made of materials tha could spread disease in her days.  The solitary sin was on a list and the reference does not actually fit if memory serves me. The conditional prophecy which made mention of and the fact that SDA do teach conditonal prophcies answers about the Second Coming. Was she supposed to say it was not soon when the Bible says it is and be ready? Some of the things she said are no longer true since they have been fixed.  But yes she still make mistakes and is not nor ever was perfect.

    Quote
    As far as your personal acceptance of EGW, perhaps you did not accept her as a prophet when they baptized you or accepted you into the church.  However, read the fundamentals of your religion and you usually recite those at the baptism as a profession of faith and her gift of prophecy is one of them.

    I accept her as a prophetess and have defended her quite often.  She worked to make the lives of people healther and point people to JESUS.  But have her writings been misused and misunderstood by some. Yes.


    Quote
    I am certain people from other denominations have/had anxiety over damnation.  I think that some denominations do it better than others, SDA's amongst the better ones at instilling the fear into people. 

    Maybe. But a good healthy fear of GOD is the beginning of wisdom. I have met many people who live like the devil and yet still think they are going to heaven.  One guy I worked with left his wife and children to live with his girlfriend yet still insisted he would live with JESUS.  So the point is to find a healthy balance. Just like finding a healthy balance in what we do.
     
    Logged
    Samuelbb7
    Jr. Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Posts: 83


    « Reply #55 on: April 25, 2009, 07:25:10 PM »

    Let me tell you something. And before the usual response of saying, "Your family does not eat properly and does not know how to eat a proper vegetarian diet" I will tell you about my family.  My Dad is an RN with his certification as an anesthetist as well as a ND certificate.  My Mom is an LPN and my one all of my brothers are either nurses or massage practitioners.  They eat a whole grain, mostly raw vegetarian diet with what is considered adequate plant proteins on the two meal a day program your prophetess perscribes.  It is considered sound even by the secular vegan.  That being said, when my father had his massive heart attack and a quadruple bypass his albumin levels were so critically low the cardiologist threw a fit over their diet.  Albumin level is a marker of adequate nutrition and a predictor of healing of surgical wounds.  He wasn't happy.  Despite this excessive diet my dads lipid profile was a disaster. 

    I have nephews and nieces that growth percentiles are at the failure to thrive level, their hgb/hct levels low and the best the family can offer is that they are being measured by the standards of meat eaters and they are "normal" for vegans.  Yet there is no established data but it is clear that vegan children are not meeting the acceptable norms in terms of adequate nutrition and growth that the rest of children have.  They are held to the advice of your prophetess to not allow kids to eat between meals while all the contemporary nutritional knowledge say that healthy snacks are a part of a healthy diet and essential to the growing child. 


    I am sorry to hear this about your family.  Maybe if you showed them this they might do better.

         We appreciate your experience as a physician, and yet I say that milk and eggs should be included in your diet. These things cannot at present be dispensed with, and the doctrine of dispensing with them should not be taught. {CD 204.2}

         You are in danger of taking too radical a view of health reform, and of prescribing for yourself a diet that will not sustain you. . . . {CD 204.3}


    As far as I have looked White never suggested a vegan diet. She did warn that some could not drink milk since it made them ill.
    Logged
    Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
      Print  
     
    Jump to:  

    Recent

    Stats

    Members
    Stats
    • Total Posts: 83958
    • Total Topics: 2508
    • Online Today: 29
    • Online Ever: 133
    • (March 03, 2010, 07:21:16 AM)
    Users Online
    Users: 1
    Guests: 23
    Total: 24
    TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
    Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC |

    Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM